AEO/GEO Software Pricing

A monthly price is only useful when the buyer knows which job is being billed. Vendors may meter prompts, models, captured responses, domains, projects, workspaces, generated articles, agent runs, API access, analysis, advisory time, or monitoring cadence.

Those units describe different operating systems. One package may mainly collect mentions, another may combine visibility data with content production, and another may connect recurring answers with source evidence, action priorities, and retesting. Similar monthly prices therefore do not imply equivalent work or equivalent outcomes.

The practical comparison starts with the decision a team needs to make: observe where it appears, understand why an answer looks wrong, decide what to change, produce the change, or verify whether the intervention was followed by a measurable difference.

This is a comparable buying snapshot, not a universal market minimum or maximum. Free audits, annual discounts, custom enterprise contracts, additional engines, domains, prompts, advisory services, and taxes can materially change the amount paid.

Prompt count is only one dimension. Buyers also need to compare the number of models, geographic markets and languages, collection frequency, domains or brands, workspaces, team seats, response quotas, exports, API access, implementation guidance, and human advisory time.

Billing terms add another layer. An advertised monthly equivalent may require annual payment, while a nominally higher plan may remain cancellable month-to-month. Overage prices and paid add-ons can reverse the apparent ordering once the required prompt volume, engines, locations, or collaborators are included.

A useful quote should make the monitored unit and refresh cadence explicit, distinguish software from service, and show what happens when the buyer exceeds a quota. Without that ledger, a price comparison is incomplete.

The current buying choice is the work delivered. The first improvement supplies findings, a source workbook, a bounded draft, publishing instructions and an agreed comparison. The Content Improvement Pack purchases one website or PR and creator route.

Your team approves the work and publishes the changes for the $99 and $399 packages. Hands-on publishing by Kojable is optional, quoted separately and needs suitable site access. For PR and creator work, your team handles outreach, partnerships and publication unless separately agreed. Creator and third-party fees are additional.

Optional Ongoing Support includes platform access and the agreed monthly workbook, materials, reviews, checks and report. It does not automatically include a complete one-time package or unlimited publishing. The managed pilot is separately scoped.

The competitor table above preserves its 3 August 2026 research date, including Kojable’s historical Starter subscription. Those older monthly plans remain relevant to existing arrangements; they are not the current new-customer catalogue. See current packages and complete scope.

The first improvement covers 1 webpage, with technical SEO notes and 10 prompts tracked for 1 month. The content pack covers up to 10 webpages, with technical SEO and documentation and 10 prompts per page tracked for 2 months. The customer approves and publishes both packages. Hands-on publishing by Kojable and PR and creator campaigns are separately quoted.

Compare those deliverables with the research, writing, publishing and review work your team actually needs. Source-page allowances describe research capacity, not guaranteed placements. Confirm quantities, AI coverage, review allowances and delivery dates in writing before payment.

Fit should be assessed against the buyer’s dominant job, not a general league table. The following comparison describes the emphasis visible in each public offer and does not declare a universal winner.

• Recoverable analyst time is the loaded cost of recurring collection, comparison, diagnosis, and reporting that the platform can credibly replace.
• Avoidable external-service cost is consultancy, agency, research, or data work that is no longer required. Count only genuine substitutions.
• Attributable gross profit is the profit attached to measured incremental outcomes with a defensible link to the work, not forecast revenue or general market growth.
• Implementation and management cost includes staff time for reviewing evidence, making changes, coordinating owners, and maintaining measurement.

The ceiling is a decision boundary, not a spending target. Recalculate it when team costs, platform scope, attribution evidence, or the implementation burden changes.

1. Which prompts, topics, questions, or responses count toward the plan?
2. Which AI models and answer surfaces are included?
3. How many countries, languages, and locations can be monitored?
4. How often is each comparable question collected and refreshed?
5. How many domains, brands, projects, and workspaces are included?
6. How many seats are included, and what does another user cost?
7. Which response, article, agent-run, report, export, or API quotas apply?
8. What happens at the limit: blocked use, overage billing, or an automatic upgrade?
9. Does the platform only observe mentions, or also diagnose likely source and information gaps?
10. Are recommendations prioritised and tied to visible evidence?
11. Does the package explain how to implement changes and who owns that work?
12. Can later tests be compared fairly with the original baseline?
13. Which functions are software, automated content, analyst work, or advisory service?
14. Are the advertised prices monthly, annual equivalents, tax-exclusive, or custom?
15. What are the renewal, cancellation, data-export, history-retention, and service-change terms?

The completed ledger should be stored beside the buying decision. It makes later renewal reviews possible when prices, limits, product scope, or internal usage change.